Typical VC Series A valuation process: Counterintuitively disconnected from true valuation

What this means for your Series A deal is that, to a large extent, the value of your company is going to be reverse-engineered from the cap table. Here is how this works:

1. You and your investors agree you need $X ($3M, for example)

2. The investors want to own a certain percentage post-financing (I%) (2 x 20% = 40%, for example if two VCs are syndicating the deal)

3. The post-money valuation is now $X/I% or $3M/40% = $7.5M

4. You negotiate the size of the option pool (P%) (25%, for example)

5. Your true pre-money valuation (what the founders’ stake is worth) is $X*[(1-I%-P%)/I%] or $2,625,000.

There are two things to notice about this process. First, at no point did it require justifying the value of the startup. Second, the margin for negotiation is somewhat limited as (a) the option pool size should be budget-driven and (b) most investors, rightly or wrongly, are pretty set on the percentage ownership they require.

views
4 responses
in my experience there is no way around it. the company needs a certain amount of money, VCs have a set percentage of the company they want... and to be honest, in most cases, the valuation techniques for pre-revenue startups are questionable at best. the result is typically driven by need (on the entrepreneurs side) and past experiences (on the VC side) because there is no "true" valuation.
Thank for the information, its very useful to mi after reading it.
Pledges,Valuation, Home
The disassembly is not usually problem, but reassembling a fake watches after damaging locations and accepting it to plan appropriately can be an backbreaking and assiduous action that requires cogent accomplishment and knowledge. Furthermore, while an abreast getting may anticipate that they can adjustment a array or apple-pie a bandage on their own, any action that requires disassembling a watch is risky.
1 visitor upvoted this post.