it's what you eat, not how hard you try to work it off, that matters more in losing weight

"In general, for weight loss, exercise is pretty useless," says Eric Ravussin, chair in diabetes and metabolism at Louisiana State University and a prominent exercise researcher. Many recent studies have found that exercise isn't as important in helping people lose weight as you hear so regularly in gym advertisements or on shows like The Biggest Loser — or, for that matter, from magazines like this one.

The basic problem is that while it's true that exercise burns calories and that you must burn calories to lose weight, exercise has another effect: it can stimulate hunger. That causes us to eat more, which in turn can negate the weight-loss benefits we just accrued. Exercise, in other words, isn't necessarily helping us lose weight. It may even be making it harder.

Sounds like there's a sea change brewing in the way people view exercise and weight loss.

views
9 responses
I dunno. I think people just want to read about new diet ideas and new research so they can make excuses to themselves.

Oh, I've been doing too much exercise! I do get hungry after I work out! How stupid was I to get that gym membership!

Or:

Whoa, I can cut out carbs and eat as much steak and fat as I want? Sign me up!

Just eat well, exercise well, and be fit. It's not easy, but all the commentary doesn't really help.

This is what Gary Taubes argues in "Good Calories, Bad Calories." People should also note that exercise has other benefits.

@Sachin Yes, but you have to define what eating well, exercising well, and being fit is. Conventional wisdom about diet is so backwards.

I think it's easy to define how to be healthy: everything in moderation. That's it. Why do people need rules to be fit?

If I think about my relatives back in India, they cook with straight butter, drink full fat milk, and eat eggs for breakfast every morning.

But they eat lots more vegetables than we do here, everything is cooked fresh, there is no fast food. And they don't go to the gym. What's a gym? They just live normal, active lives.

You can eat anything you want, as long as there is balance and moderation.

OK, I finally RTFA, and all it says is "In short, it's what you eat, not how hard you try to work it off, that matters more in losing weight." No suggestions on what to eat? Thanks for nothing. One of my long held pet theories, supported by the article, is obesity is linked to car use. The more you have to get somewhere without a car, the better your chance of not being fat.
re: obesity linked to car use. I'd buy into that. My family in india doesn't use a car to get around, they are fit. And in New York, people were much more fit than they are here in CA. You need to be active constantly, not just for 30 minutes a day on a treadmill
Sachin: I know from experience that the no-carb diet works. My brother lives off steak and eggs and has for years. He weighs what he did in HS and is very fit. A family friend has been on a no-carb died since the early 1960's and has maintained his low weight despite a completely sedentary life style. Both eat all the meat and fat they want.

The worst carbs are sugar carbs from HFCS, but all carbs are the reason for weigh gain.

The only reason you think butter, full fat milk, and eggs are "bad" for you is because you're misled by Conventional Wisdom. Furthermore, I suspect your relatives in India have a much stronger culture with respect to what they should be eating. In that sense, they have implicit rules passed from generation to generation about what they should be eating.

@lbutlr I hope you mean no refined carbs, i.e. I hope your brother eats vegetables.

Nope, no carbs at all. Or at least less than 15g or so a day.
1 visitor upvoted this post.