If you smoke a lot of weed and try to write about technology, this is what you get.

What happens now is that these stream objects are lit up with transactional properties. Code gets run based on incoming events, pulling it out of the teeming inbox before we see it and converted into actions predetermined by our inference engines and workflow rules. “If Retweet equals Member of Strategy Group, add to midmorning direct message queue.” “If Silverlight press conference transcript feed contains question from Mary Jo Foley, route to broker queue with Unload flag.” And so on.

This is not AI or smart computing; it’s harvesting social signals in the context of realtime economics.

--Steve Gillmor via techcrunch.com

I dig it, it's poetry right? Right Steve? You're so beat.

*snaps fingers*

views
2 responses
Sadly, I totally get what Gilmour is saying and it makes perfect sense.
no, no, I understand what he's trying to say, at least in the last few sentences. his thoughts are confusing mostly because of grammatical errors, incorrect terminology, and the fact that he's dead wrong - harvesting social signals and acting upon them based upon a decision tree is the definition of artificial intelligence.