Best example of survivorship bias I've heard: WWII planes returning from battle

During World War II the English sent daily bombing raids into Germany. Many planes never returned; those that did were often riddled with bullet holes from anti-air machine guns and German fighters.

Wanting to improve the odds of getting a crew home alive, English engineers studied the locations of the bullet holes. Where the planes were hit most, they reasoned, is where they should attach heavy armor plating. Sure enough, a pattern emerged: Bullets clustered on the wings, tail, and rear gunner's station. Few bullets were found in the main cockpit or fuel tanks.

The logical conclusion is that they should add armor plating to the spots that get hit most often by bullets. But that's wrong.

Planes with bullets in the cockpit or fuel tanks didn't make it home; the bullet holes in returning planes were "found" in places that were by definition relatively benign. The real data is in the planes that were shot down, not the ones that survived.

 

views
4 responses
That's classic epidemiology right there. It's quite possible that the people you'd want to study have kicked the bucket already and never made it into your study sample.
Thanks for the mention! Yeah I liked that story because it's literally "surviving," so it makes it easier for a reader new to the subject to ascribe meaning to the word "survivor." Cheers!
If you want authentic and effective liquid lida daidaihua it will cost you more. Real Lida daidaihua is rare and expensive so it costs more if you want a lida daidaihua that is unadulterated and of high quality. Don't be tempted by less expensive brands because they are generally not effective.
1 visitor upvoted this post.